Skip to main content

Identification of sex-biased and gonadal developmental miRNAs during critical windows of early gonadal differentiation in the Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus)

Abstract

The Chinese giant salamander (CGS), Andrias davidianus, the largest living amphibian, is of significant conservation importance for its wild populations and serves as a valuable economic species in aquaculture. Given that male CGS are larger than female, understanding the mechanisms behind gonadal differentiation and development is critical for optimizing production in aquaculture. This study conducted small RNA-seq on male and female gonads during two key differentiation windows in CGS. PCA analysis revealed distinct clustering within groups and clear differentiation between groups. A total of 374 miRNAs were identified, including 162 known and 212 novel miRNAs. Differential expression and enrichment analysis across the two time points identified nine sex-biased miRNAs involved in CGS gonadal differentiation, including let-7b-3p, miR-3529-3p, miR-34c-5p, miR-10-5p, miR-7-5p, and four novel miRNAs, and network of these nine sex-biased miRNAs with their target genes were constructed. Furthermore, our findings suggest that male and female gonadal development processes are likely regulated by distinct miRNAs. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of sex-biased and gonadal development related miRNAs in CGS, offering a theoretical foundation for enhancing CGS aquaculture productivity through targeted sex ratio management.

Peer Review reports

Background

Aquatic animals, often referred to as “blue food,” are playing an increasingly important role in global food security [1, 2]. Among fish and other aquatic species, sex is one of the most valuable traits, as there are distinct sexual dimorphisms in growth, size, and other characteristics [3]. Therefore, creating monosex populations (all-male or all-female) or producing populations with higher proportions of males or females can significantly enhance aquaculture efficiency [4]. Consequently, further exploration of the sex determination mechanisms and sex control methods in aquaculture species will continue to drive sustainable aquaculture practices and global food supply [5]. However, the concept of sex determination remains a subject of debate [6, 7]. A recent perspective challenges the "Top-level" sex determiner model, suggesting the idea of "Turtles all the way up!"—that no gene truly sits at the top of the regulatory hierarchy because its expression is controlled by another layer of upstream regulatory factors [7]. Increasing evidence highlights the critical role of non-coding RNAs in sex determination and gonadal differentiation, further supporting the notion of higher-level regulatory factors above genes. For example, the transposon DRBX1 of the sex-determining gene DMRT1 plays a key role in sex determination in Betta splendens [8], and Ca2 + plays a pivotal role in sex determination in both Trachemys scripta and Pogona vitticeps [9, 10].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA molecules that play critical roles in the regulation of gene expression at posttranscription level [11]. These miRNAs can function as key regulators by modulating the expression of genes associated with sex differentiation, influencing pathways that drive the development of male or female characteristics. miRNA regulation of gene expression follows a complex network, where a single miRNA can control the expression of hundreds of target genes, while a single gene can be simultaneously regulated by multiple miRNAs. miRNAs play a crucial role in reproduction by regulating the synthesis and function of sex steroid hormones [12]. In recent years, an increasing body of evidence has highlighted the involvement of miRNAs in various biological processes, including sex determination and gonadal development [13]. Studies on mammals have established miRNAs as key regulators of biologically significant traits with economic relevance. Their development has advanced significantly in diagnostics and therapeutics [14]. However, despite the ecological and commercial significance of aquaculture, research on miRNAs in this field remains largely exploratory. Further investigation into the role of miRNAs in aquaculture reproduction could enhance breeding techniques, contributing to the holistic development of the aquaculture sector [15]. miRNAs have been shown to play a significant role in gonadal differentiation, exhibiting notable sex bias [16, 17]. However, the existence of a "sex-determining miRNA" still requires further experimental validation. Current studies on miRNAs in aquaculture species primarily focus on fish, crustaceans, and other species. For instance, significant differences in miRNA expression have been observed between males and pseudomales in Cynoglossus semilaevis [16]. Additionally, miRNAs also show notable differences between normal males and females in Portunus trituberculatus [17]. However, despite amphibians being an important group of aquaculture species [18, 19], reports on sex-biased miRNAs in amphibians remain limited.

The Chinese giant salamander (CGS), Andrias davidianus, is the largest and with long evolutionary history species in the world. Wild populations of CGS are critically important for conservation efforts [20], while captive populations are recognized for their significant value in high-quality aquaculture [18, 19]. Studying the sex of CGS can effectively enhance reproductive efficiency, supporting a sufficient population size for strategic field releases. Furthermore, given that male CGS are larger and exhibit faster development [21], maintaining a male-biased captive population can significantly enhance economic returns in aquaculture. Current research on sex-related mechanisms in the CGS is predominantly concentrated at mRNA level [22, 23]. Similar to zebrafish, the timing of gonadal development differs between the male and female in the CGS [24]. To fully understand these dynamics, it is crucial to explore the critical windows of gonadal differentiation prior to the maintenance of adult gonads, which is essential for advancing sex related studies. Our recent study, which integrates histological phenotypic analysis with molecular data, has identified distinct differences in the timing of gonadal differentiation between male and female CGS. Specifically, around 210 days post hatching (dph) marks the critical window for gonadal differentiation in females, while this key period occurs at approximately 270 dph in males [25]. Focusing on these two critical periods offers valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying sex determination and gonadal differentiation in CGS, and exploring miRNAs in CGS is expected to clarify their regulatory impact on mRNA. This also has important implications for artificial control of sex ratios in CGS populations. Increasing the production of larger male CGS can significantly enhance both the overall yield and the economic benefits of CGS cultivation. Previous studies have conducted small RNA sequencing exclusively on 3-year-old male CGS and 4-year-old male and female CGS [26, 27]. While these findings may provide insights into the miRNAs required for gonadal maintenance in CGS, they do not capture the miRNA expression patterns during the critical periods of gonadal differentiation and development. Research on miRNAs during the early gonadal differentiation window in CGS remains unexplored.

This study performed small RNA sequencing at two critical windows of CGS gonadal differentiation, identified in previous research, with the goal of exploring the differential expression patterns of miRNAs involved in male and female gonadal differentiation and identifying miRNAs associated with CGS gonadal development. This is the first to investigate male and female gonads of CGS across multiple time points from the miRNA perspective, allowing for a more precise exploration of miRNAs associated with sexual dimorphism and gonadal development in CGS. The findings aim to lay the groundwork for molecular regulation of CGS breeding in aquaculture and to enhance production efficiency.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

All CGS used in this study were captive-bred individuals sourced from the Yunxing Professional Breeding Cooperative of Chinese Giant Salamander in Ya'an, Sichuan Province. These CGS were offspring of the same parental group. We anesthetized the CGS using MS-222, a commonly used aquaculture anesthetic, dissolved in water at a concentration of 1 mL per 20 L. Once the CGS were fully anesthetized, cervical vertebral dislocation was performed before proceeding with sampling. Samples were collected at 210 and 270 dph. F210 and M210 represent female and male gonads at 210 dph, respectively, while F270 and M270 represent female and male gonads at 270 dph, respectively. Tail tip tissue was first collected from each sample, and DNA was extracted using a Tiangen DNA extraction kit. Subsequently, PCR amplification was performed using the CGS female-specific primer adf340 to determine the sex of each sample [27] (Table 1). Then, Gonadal tissues were then collected under a dissecting microscope. Due to the small size of CGS gonads, tissues from three individuals were pooled into a single sample. A total of six male and six female gonadal samples were collected at each stage, with three samples designated for RNA-seq and three for qPCR analysis. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for ten minutes and then stored at −80 °C until RNA isolation.

Table 1 Primer for sex identification

RNA Isolation, library construction and small RNA sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from gonadal tissues using the RNAiso™ Plus RNA Kit (TaKaRa) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and RNA integrity was assessed using the Agilent 5400 Fragment Analyzer (Agilent, USA). Small RNA libraries were prepared from 2 µg of total RNA per sample using the NEBNext® Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set for Illumina® (NEB, USA). PCR amplification was conducted with LongAmp Taq 2X Master Mix, SR Primer for Illumina, and Index Primer. PCR products were purified on an 8% polyacrylamide gel, and DNA fragments of 140–160 bp were recovered and dissolved in 8 µL elution buffer. Library quality was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system with DNA High Sensitivity Chips. Index-coded samples were clustered using the cBot Cluster Generation System with the TruSeg SR Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina) following the manufacturer's protocol. After clustering, libraries were sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 platform, producing 50 bp single-end reads.

Quality control, miRNA Identification and target gene prediction

To obtain clean reads, raw reads in fastq format were processed using Perl and Python scripts. Reads containing poly-N, poly-A/T/G/C sequences, 5' adapter contamination, or missing 3' adapters or insert tags were removed. The 3' adapter sequences were trimmed, and Q20, Q30, GC content were calculated. Reads shorter than 18 bp or longer than 35 bp were discarded.

The processed small RNA reads were mapped to the CGS gonad transcriptome [13](SRA accession number: PRJNA1029821) using Bowtie (https://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/), allowing for up to one mismatch base. Known miRNAs were identified by aligning the mapped reads to the mature miRNAs of two amphibian species, Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis, as well as Homo sapiens, which has the highest number of known miRNAs among vertebrates, sourced from miRBase 22.0 (http://www.mirbase.org/). Prior to novel miRNA prediction, reads originating from protein-coding genes, repeat sequences, rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA were removed. Small RNAs were classified as ncRNAs using the Rfam database (http://rfam.xfam.org/), and repeat sequences were filtered out with RepeatMasker (https://www.repeatmasker.org/). Additionally, reads mapped to introns or exons, representing mRNA fragments, were excluded. Novel miRNAs were then predicted by integrating miREvo [28] and miRDeep2 [29].

The target gene prediction of miRNA was performed by miRanda (http://www.miranda.org/), Targetscan (http://www.targetscan.org/), and RNAhybrid (http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid/). To investigate the biological functions and pathways associated with these candidate target genes, enrichment analyses were conducted using Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). The mRNA–miRNA network relationships were visualized using Cytoscape software.

Identification of differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs)

MiRNA expression levels were quantified using transcripts per million (TPM). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in R to evaluate sample relationships and clustering patterns based on gene expression profiles. Differential expression analysis was carried out in R using the DESeq2 package [30], with miRNAs exhibiting a |log2[fold change]|≥ 1 and p-value < 0.05 between any two groups considered as differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs). The Venn diagram was created using Evenn (http://www.ehbio.com/test/venn/#/).

Real-time quantitative PCR verification

RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Japan), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The primers used are listed in Table 2, with U6 serving as the internal reference gene. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and relative mRNA expression levels were determined using the 2^−ΔΔCT method. Data visualization was done using GraphPad Prism 8.0.

Table 2 The primers used in RT-qPCR

Results

Characteristics of the small-RNA sequencing data

Small-RNA sequencing was performed on male and female gonadal samples of CGS at two critical developmental stages, 210 and 270 dph. A total of 12 libraries were generated, producing approximately 153.8 million raw reads. Following quality control, including the removal of low-quality reads and the retention of reads between 18–35 bp in length, approximately 149.8 million high-quality clean reads were retained. All samples exhibited a Q30 score above 96.55%, with GC content ranging from 50.26% to 54.95%. These metrics confirm that the sequencing data are of high quality and suitable for downstream analyses (Table 3).

Table 3 Summary statistics for the small RNA-seq data from each sample

In this study, a total of 374 miRNAs were identified, including 162 known miRNAs and 212 novel miRNAs. At both 210 dph and 270 dph, the number of miRNAs identified in the female gonads was higher than in the male gonads. In male gonads, more miRNAs were identified at 210 dph compared to 270 dph, whereas the number of miRNAs in female gonads showed no significant difference between the two time points (Table 4). Additional non-coding RNAs identified in CGS gonads, including rRNAs, tRNAs, snRNAs, and snoRNAs, are presented in Table S1.

Table 4 Number of miRNAs identified in this study

Identification of DEMs between female and male at different stages

To assess the correlation of miRNA expression between samples, PCA analysis was conducted using the TPM values of 374 expressed miRNAs. The results indicated that the biological replicates clustered within distinct, independent ellipses, while different ellipses represented different groups, demonstrating a clear separation between groups (Fig. 1). This finding suggests that the sequencing results are suitable for subsequent analyses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Principal component analysis results of the twelve samples from the four groups in this study

Pairwise comparisons were performed between male and female samples at 210 dph and 270 dph to identify DEMs between the two groups (Fig. 2A-B). Down-regulated DEMs are indicative of male-specific miRNAs, whereas up-regulated DEMs signify female-specific miRNAs. At 210 dph, a total of 14 male-specific miRNAs were identified (6 known miRNAs and 8 novel miRNAs), along with 12 female-specific miRNAs (7 known miRNAs and 5 novel miRNAs). At 270 dph, 19 male-specific miRNAs were identified (7 known miRNAs and 12 novel miRNAs), as well as 11 female-specific miRNAs (7 known miRNAs and 4 novel miRNAs) (Fig. 2C). Among all DEMs, 10 were found to exhibit differential expression at both 210 dph and 270 dph. Additionally, 16 DEMs showed differential expression exclusively at 210 dph, while 20 DEMs were uniquely differentially expressed at 270 dph (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Volcano of differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) between males and females at 210dph (A) and 270dph (B). Numbers of DEMs for pairwise comparisons between males and females at two stages (C). Venn diagram of DEMs in two stages (D). Down: down-regulated DEMs and representative male-specific miRNAs. Up: up-regulated DEMs and representative female-specific miRNAs

Enrichment analysis of predicted target genes

To further explore the functions of the target genes of DEMs, target gene prediction was performed for the identified DEMs. We conducted enrichment analyses separately for the target genes corresponding to DEMs that were differentially expressed exclusively at 210 dph, exclusively at 270 dph, and at both 210 dph and 270 dph (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Heatmap of all sex-biased DEMs (A). The red box indicates miRNAs differentially expressed only at 210 dph; the blue box indicates miRNAs differentially expressed only at 270 dph; the black box indicates miRNAs differentially expressed at both 210 dph and 270 dph; the green box indicates miRNAs highly expressed in male gonads; and the yellow box indicates miRNAs highly expressed in female gonads. B: GO enrichment results of target genes corresponding to miRNAs differentially expressed only at 210 dph; C: GO enrichment results of target genes corresponding to miRNAs differentially expressed only at 270 dph; D: GO enrichment results of target genes corresponding to miRNAs differentially expressed at both 210 dph and 270 dph

The red line marks miRNAs that were differentially expressed exclusively at 210 dph, with 16 miRNAs predicted to target 7,824 genes. GO enrichment analysis revealed that these target genes were primarily involved in lipid biosynthetic processes (GO:0008610), response to bacterium (GO:0009617), and defense response to bacterium (GO:0042742) under the Biological Process (BP) category. In the Cellular Component (CC) category, the genes were mainly associated with the photosystem (GO:0009521) and protein kinase complex (GO:1,902,911). Under Molecular Function (MF), the targets were significantly enriched for hydrolase activity, specifically acting on glycosyl bonds (GO:0016798), and acyltransferase activity (GO:0016746) (Fig. 3B). KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated notable enrichment in the axon guidance pathway (ko04360) and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (ko04360) (Fig. S1A).

In contrast, the blue line highlights miRNAs differentially expressed only at 270 dph, with 20 miRNAs predicted to target 8,587 genes. GO enrichment analysis for these targets predominantly implicated chromatin organization (GO:0006325) and cellular developmental processes (GO:0048869) in the BP category. In the CC category, the target genes were mainly associated with the endoplasmic reticulum (GO:0005783) and endoplasmic reticulum membrane (GO:0005789). For MF, significant enrichment was observed in glycosyltransferase activity (GO:0016757) and metallopeptidase activity (GO:0008237) (Fig. 3C). KEGG pathway analysis showed enrichment in the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (ko04151) and the Phospholipase D signaling pathway (ko04072) (Fig. S1B).

The black line indicates miRNAs that were differentially expressed at both 210 dph and 270 dph, with 10 miRNAs predicted to target 6,028 genes. GO enrichment analysis of these target genes highlighted significant involvement in reproduction (GO:0000003), reproductive process (GO:0022414), sexual reproduction (GO:0019953), and even asexual reproduction (GO:0019954) within the BP category. In the CC category, the target genes were mainly linked to the catenin complex (GO:0016342) and the extrinsic component of the plasma membrane (GO:0019897). For MF, significant enrichment was observed in beta-catenin binding (GO:0008013) and phosphatase activity (GO:0016791) (Fig. 3D). KEGG pathway analysis revealed enrichment in the AMPK signaling pathway (ko04152) and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (ko04151) (Fig. S1C). Notably, the target genes of this miRNA group were significantly enriched in several well-defined sex-related terms. Among these, novel_33 showed a male-biased expression tendency at 210 dph, which shifted towards female-biased expression at 270 dph. Given this, we propose that the role of novel_33 in sex determination and gonadal differentiation is likely minimal, prompting us to direct more focus towards the other nine sex-biased miRNAs in this group in subsequent analyses.

Integrated analysis of the sex-biased miRNAs and corresponding target genes

Based on the functional enrichment results, we propose that the nine sex-biased miRNAs differentially expressed at both 210 and 270 dph are most closely linked to CGS sex determination and gonadal differentiation. The mature sequences of these nine sex-biased miRNAs are presented in Table S2. To further investigate, we plan to explore the co-expression networks of these sex-biased miRNAs and their corresponding target genes. In our previous study, we identified female-specific and male-specific genes associated with CGS (Tables S2 and S4 in reference 13), ultimately identifying 114 sex-related genes linked to CGS. By intersecting these genes with the predicted targets of the DEMs from the current study, we identified a set of CGS-related target genes involved in sex determination and gonadal differentiation. Given that miRNAs negatively regulate the expression of their target genes, most interacting miRNAs and mRNAs exhibited inverse expression patterns in the gonads.

Among the male-biased miRNAs, we identified one known miRNA and three novel miRNAs, collectively regulating 65 target genes (Fig. 4A and Table S3). Four target genes (XIAP, NSD1, TBL1X and WNK2) were associated with all four miRNAs. Additionally, novel_357 had the highest number of associated target genes, with a total of 39. The miRNA-mRNA co-expression correlation heatmap shows that let-7b-3p negatively regulates male-related mRNAs BMP6, FHL2, and FGF23 at 210 and 270 dph. Novel_28 negatively regulates male-related mRNAs such as TBX1, SOX9, and STAR. Novel_60 negatively regulates SOX9, FGF23, and FGF7, while novel_261 negatively regulates STAR, FGF23, and FGF7. The downregulation of these miRNAs leads to an increase in the expression of their target mRNAs, thereby inducing the activation of male pathways (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The network of nine sex-biased miRNAs and their target genes. A: Network of four miRNAs with sixty-five target genes. B: Network of five miRNAs with seventy-six target genes. Orange represents miRNAs; blue represents mRNAs

Fig. 5
figure 5

Nine sex-biased miRNAs and their target genes expression correlation heatmap. The green boxes highlight the positions of the sex-biased miRNAs

In the female-biased miRNAs, four known miRNAs and one novel miRNA were associated with 76 target genes (Fig. 4B and Table S4). Both miR-34c-5p and novel_28 were associated with the highest number of target genes, each regulating 47 genes. The SOX9 gene was regulated by four miRNAs, excluding miR-10-5p. TBX1 showed a strong association with miR-10-5p and miR-3529-3p. Additionally, the male sex-related gene DMRT1 exhibited an inverse regulatory relationship with miR-7-5p. The miRNA-mRNA co-expression correlation heatmap shows that miR-10b-5p, miR-34c-5p, and novel_28 negatively regulate the female-related gene RSPO1, while miR-34c-5p and novel_28 exhibit a negative regulatory relationship with ZP3 and ZP4. MiR-7-5p negatively regulates GDF9. Notably, the female sex-determining candidate gene TRPM1, which we identified in a previous study, is negatively regulated by miR-3529-3p. The downregulation of these miRNAs leads to an increase in the expression of their target mRNAs, thereby inducing the activation of female pathways.

Identification of DEMs in gonadal development

To investigate miRNAs associated with gonadal development during the critical windows of gonadal differentiation in the CGS, we analysed miRNAs related to male and female gonadal development by comparing 270 dph with 210 dph (Fig. 6A-B). In males, 74 DEMs were identified, including 30 upregulated and 44 downregulated DEMs. In females, a total of 68 DEMs were identified, comprising 20 upregulated and 48 downregulated DEMs (Fig. 6C). Among all gonadal development related DEMs, 29 were identified exclusively in males, while 23 were found only in females. Additionally, 45 miRNAs exhibited differential expression in both sexes (Fig. 6D).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Volcano of differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) between two stages at male (A) and female (B). Numbers of DEMs for pairwise comparisons between two stages at male and female (C). Venn diagram of DEMs in male and female (D)

To further explore the functions of the target genes of above DEMs, target gene prediction was performed for the identified DEMs. We conducted enrichment analyses separately for the target genes corresponding to DEMs that were differentially expressed exclusively in male, exclusively in female, and at both in male and female (Fig. 7A). GO enrichment analysis revealed that the target genes of DEMs identified exclusively in males were primarily enriched in processes such as cell differentiation (GO:0030154), cellular developmental processes (GO:0048869), cell development (GO:0048468), GTP binding (GO:0005525), guanyl ribonucleotide binding (GO:0032561) and guanyl nucleotide binding (GO:0019001) (Fig. 7B). In contrast, the target genes of DEMs identified exclusively in females were primarily enriched in pathways such as intracellular signal transduction (GO:0035556), cell wall organization or biogenesis (GO:0071554), calcium-mediated signaling (GO:0019722), endosome formation (GO:0005768), and phosphatase activity (GO:0016791) (Fig. 7C). Additionally, the target genes of DEMs expressed in both males and females were primarily enriched in processes such as disaccharide metabolic processes (GO:0005984), transcription by RNA polymerase II (GO:0006366), plasma membrane protein complexes (GO:0098797), thylakoid (GO:0009579), metalloendopeptidase activity (GO:0004222), and hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds (GO:0004553) (Fig. 7D). KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the target genes from all three groups were enriched in pathways involving GTP-binding proteins (ko04151) and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (ko04031) (Fig. S2).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Heatmap of all gonadal developmental DEMs (A). The red box indicates miRNAs differentially expressed only in male; the blue box indicates miRNAs differentially expressed only in female; the black box indicates miRNAs differentially expressed in both male and female. B: GO enrichment results of target genes corresponding to miRNAs differentially expressed only in male; C: GO enrichment results of target genes corresponding to miRNAs differentially expressed only in female; D: GO enrichment results of target genes corresponding to miRNAs differentially expressed in both male and female

Validation of sex-biased miRNAs

To validate the reliability of the small RNA-seq data, we selected above nine sex-biased miRNAs, including five known miRNAs (let-7b-3p, miR-34c-5p, miR-7-5p, miR-3529-3p and miR-10b-5p) and four novel miRNAs (novel_261, novel_60, novel_157, novel_28), from two pivotal stages of early gonadal differentiation (210 dph and 270 dph) to perform RT-qPCR analysis. Consequently, it indicates that the RT-qPCR results are consistent with the small RNA-seq results, confirming the reliability and accuracy of the small RNA-seq data analysis (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Comparison of small RNA-seq and qRT-PCR results of nine sex-biased miRNAs in the 210dph and 270dph

Discussion

The discovery of miRNAs has been a landmark achievement in molecular biology, significantly advancing our understanding of gene regulation, as evidenced by the awarding of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun, the pioneers of miRNA research (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2024/press-release/). However, research on sex-related miRNAs in amphibians, particularly in Caudata species, remains extremely limited. Previous studies comparing miRNAs in the ovaries and testes of four-year-old CGS identified miR-451, miR-10c, miR-101, miR-202, miR-7a, and miR-499 as potential key regulators in sex differentiation, gametogenesis, and development in CGS [26]. However, recently studies using both histological and molecular data have shown that sex differentiation in CGS is completed by 270 dph [21, 25]. At four years of age, CGS have clearly surpassed this developmental stage, leading us to conclude that the relationship between the aforementioned miRNAs and gonadal differentiation as well as development is quite limited. Moreover, while Chen et al. used transcriptomic data from Xenopus laevis as their reference sequence, this study analyzes miRNAs using transcriptomic data from CGS of the same age and sex, resulting in more accurate and reliable findings. Previous analyses of miRNAs in the testes of CGS have revealed high expression levels of miR-99b-5p, miR-10c, and miR-36 [27]. However, those studies were conducted on three-year-old CGS, which also may not accurately reflect the true processes of testicular development and differentiation. Moreover, prior research has demonstrated that the relationship between differentially expressed genes exhibiting binary expression patterns at a single time point and gonadal differentiation is quite limited [31]. This limitation likely extends to miRNAs as well. Consequently, investigating dynamic changes in gonadal differentiation and development solely from a single time point offers a constrained perspective. In earlier studies, the limitations of age were largely due to the inability to determine the sex of CGS at early stages based on phenotype. However, the development of sex markers has significantly aided research on early gonadal differentiation in CGS [32], enabling more precise analysis during critical windows of gonadal differentiation. In our recently study, we identified two critical windows of early gonadal differentiation in CGS at 210 and 270 dph [25]. Building upon these pivotal time points, the present study aims to further explore the potential sex regulatory roles of miRNAs in CGS, thereby providing deeper insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying amphibian sex differentiation.

In this study, a total of 162 known miRNAs and 212 novel miRNAs were identified from twelve samples. This may be attributed to the relatively small number of known miRNAs in amphibians; in miRBase 22.0 (http://www.mirbase.org/), the only two amphibian species listed, Xenopus laevis and X. tropicalis, have just 148 and 196 known miRNAs, respectively. A similar trend, where the number of known miRNAs is less than that of novel miRNAs, has also been observed in respiratory-related tissues of the CGS, including the gills, lungs, and skin [33]. Notably, the number of miRNAs identified in male individuals at 270 dph was significantly lower than that at 210 dph (Table 4). Given that miRNAs exert a negative regulatory effect on mRNA, our previous research indicated that 270 dph represents a critical window for male gonadal differentiation [25]. Consequently, the demand for mRNA production during gonadal differentiation at 270 dph necessitates a reduction in the number of miRNAs that suppress mRNA expression. In females, while previous studies identified 210 dph as the window for gonadal differentiation, no significant difference in the number of miRNAs was observed between 210 and 270 dph. We speculate that the window for female gonadal differentiation may occur even earlier than 210 dph. Additionally, the miRNA-mRNA co-expression correlation heatmap shows that at 270dph, the negative regulatory relationships between miRNAs and mRNAs are more clearly defined compared to 210dph (Fig. 5). This suggests that the period between 210 and 270dph may involve a significant recruitment of gonadal differentiation-related miRNAs in the gonads of CGS, which in turn participate in the regulation of gonadal differentiation through mRNA modulation.

Previous studies on Pogona vitticeps gonads found that differentially expressed genes identified at a single time point were predominantly enriched in muscle-related terms, leaving the authors questioning any direct association with sex determination [31]. Gonadal differentiation is recognized as a dynamic process [34], suggesting that identifying sex-specific genes at a single time point may have considerable limitations. In this study, we identified differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) in both male and female gonads at two critical time points, 210 dph and 270 dph. We found 16 miRNAs exhibiting differential expression only at 210 dph, 20 miRNAs only at 270 dph, and 10 miRNAs at both time points. We then performed enrichment analysis on the target genes of these three groups of DEMs. The results revealed that miRNAs differentially expressed at both time points were significantly enriched in sex related terms, whereas those specific to a single time point showed no clear enrichment in sex related terms. This suggests that miRNAs with differential expression across multiple time points may be most closely associated with gonadal differentiation. Accordingly, in subsequent analyses, we focused specifically on this subset of ten sex-biased miRNAs.

Among these ten sex-biased miRNAs that exhibited differential expression at both time points, novel_33 displayed varying sex biases in each stage. However, as this is a novel miRNA, its specific function remains undetermined based on current knowledge. Therefore, novel_33 was not a focus in this study. Should future research yield new insights, we will provide a more detailed analysis and interpretation. In the male-biased miRNAs, only one known miRNA was identified: let-7b-3p. The let-7 family was first discovered as a crucial developmental regulator in nematodes and is one of the earliest known microRNAs. Let-7 has regulatory roles in both testes and ovaries, and it has been shown to influence spermatogenesis and oocyte maturation [35, 36]. Additionally, let-7 is involved in the initial regulation of sexual maturation [37]. High expression levels of let-7 have been observed in the ovaries and testes of Portunus trituberculatus [17]. Let-7 negatively regulates ovarian development in Megalobrama amblycephala, with let-7a/b/d being the most critical [38]. In Litopenaeus vannamei and Oplegnathus punctatus, let-7 shows higher relative expression in the ovaries [39, 40]. However, in Pelteobagrus fulvidraco and Acanthopagrus latus, let-7 exhibits a male-biased expression pattern [41, 42]. The expression level of let-7a ranks among the top 10 in the semen of Cynoglossus semilaevis [16]. Similar to the latter, is highly expressed in the male gonads of CGS. In combination with findings from a prior mRNA transcriptome study [25], the targeting relationships between the nine DEMs identified in this study and sex-related genes in CGS were investigated. let-7b-3p targets the female-specific differentiation marker gene CYP19A1, as well as the sex determination candidate gene TRPM1 identified in our previous research. This suggests that let-7b-3p may negatively regulate female-related genes such as CYP19A1 and TRPM1 in CGS, facilitating differentiation along the male gonadal pathway. In contrast to our findings regarding the targeting of female genes, previous studies have shown that let-7b can negatively regulate male-related genes, such as IAG and DSX, in Eriocheir sinensis [43]. Similarly, in Paralichthys olivaceus, the let-7 family regulates CBX2, thereby influencing the expression of the SF1 gene in testes [44]. This further highlights the varying regulatory roles of the let-7 family in gonadal differentiation across different species. In the female-biased miRNAs, four known miRNAs, namely miR-3529-3p, miR-34c-5p, miR-10-5p, and miR-7-5p, were identified. Notably, research on miR-3529 in relation to sex differentiation remains unexplored. In CGS, miR-3529-3p is predicted to target several genes linked to male gonadal differentiation, including TBX1, SOX9, STAR and FGF7. This suggests that miR-3529-3p may negatively regulate these male differentiation genes, thereby promoting female differentiation in CGS. However, its regulatory patterns and mechanisms require further investigation. In Alligator sinensis, miR-10a and miR-10b have been shown to target and regulate ADCY4 and FGFR2, thereby influencing the process of mid-TSP stage [45]. In aquaculture, the expression of miR-10 is exclusively biased towards the testes in A. latus, and has been reported only in this species [41]. In contrast, miR-10 exhibits a female-biased expression in the CGS of this study. miR-34 has been shown to play an indirect role in sex differentiation and testicular development of Scylla paramamosain by regulating DMRT1, iDMRT2, DSX, and DMRT-like genes [46]. Additionally, miR-34 may indirectly modulate reproduction in S. paramamosain by binding to the 3′-UTRs of MIH, CHH, ECR, and FAMET genes and suppressing their expression [47]. Similar to let-7, miR-34 has been shown to downregulate the expression of IAG in Eriocheir sinensis [43]. In CGS, miR-34 similarly targets male-related genes, such as SOX9, aligning with previous findings. DMRT1 is an important gene involved in male gonadal differentiation, and in this study, it is targeted and regulated by miR-7-5p. Additionally, miR-7-5p also targets other crucial genes related to male gonadal differentiation, such as SOX9 and FGFFGF7. This highlights the significant role of miR-7 in the gonadal differentiation of CGS. Previous studies have similarly implicated miR-7 in the regulation of gonadal development [41, 48]. Several novel miRNAs identified in this study appear to play an important role in gonadal differentiation. This research also provides detailed sequence information for these miRNAs, though further studies are required to elucidate their specific functions and regulatory patterns on mRNA.

In our study on gonadal development, we identified 74 DEMs in males and 68 in females. These DEMs are associated with GTP-binding proteins and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Of these, 45 DEMs were present in both sexes, with their target genes primarily enriched in terms related to metabolism, transcription, and enzyme activity. The 29 DEMs unique to males were mostly enriched in categories related to cellular differentiation and development, often involving guanosine binding processes. Gonadal development is inherently a multicellular developmental process [34], and these male-specific categories suggest progression in gonadal development. In contrast, the 23 DEMs unique to females were linked to intracellular signal transduction and calcium signaling. Ca2⁺ plays a key role in gonadal development, sex differentiation, and even sex reversal [9, 10, 49]. Therefore, we propose that male and female gonadal development processes are regulated by distinct miRNAs rather than the same ones. Moreover, GTP-binding proteins and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway likely play a significant role in the gonadal development of CGS.

Conclusions

In summary, this study represents the first investigation of miRNAs associated with gonadal differentiation in CGS at two critical windows, further confirming that 210 dph and 270 dph are key periods for CGS gonadal differentiation. We identified nine common DEMs between these periods as sex-biased miRNAs of CGS gonadal differentiation, including let-7b-3p, miR-3529-3p, miR-34c-5p, miR-10-5p, miR-7-5p, and four novel miRNAs. However, our analysis also indicates that different miRNAs, rather than the same ones, may regulate the development of male and female gonads. This study provides insights into sex-biased and gonadal development related miRNAs in CGS, offering valuable references for understanding CGS sex determination and gonadal development. Additionally, it establishes an important theoretical foundation for advancing CGS aquaculture and improving production efficiency.

Data availability

The raw small RNA-seq reads are available in the NCBI SRA (accession number: PRJNA1182843; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1182843).

Abbreviations

CGS:

Chinese giant salamander

dph:

Days post hatching

miRNA:

MicroRNA

ncRNA:

Non-coding RNA

DEMs:

Differentially Expressed miRNAs

RT-qPCR:

Real-Time quantitative PCR

References

  1. Gephart JA, Henriksson PJG, Parker RWR, Shepon A, Gorospe KD, Bergman K, et al. Environmental performance of blue foods. Nature. 2021;597(7876):360–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41586-021-03889-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Golden CD, Koehn JZ, Shepon A, Passarelli S, Free CM, Viana DF, et al. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature. 2021;598(7880):315–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41586-021-03917-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li X-Y, Mei J, Ge C-T, Liu X-L, Gui J-F. Sex determination mechanisms and sex control approaches in aquaculture animals. Science China Life Sciences. 2022;65(6):1091–122. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11427-021-2075-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gui J-F, Zhou L, Li X-Y. Rethinking fish biology and biotechnologies in the challenge era for burgeoning genome resources and strengthening food security. Water Biology and Security. 2022;1(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.watbs.2021.11.001.

  5. Gui J-F, Hughes RM. Water Biology and Security ― A new open-access platform for multidisciplinary research concerning freshwater and marine ecosystems. Water Biology and Security. 2022;1(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.watbs.2021.10.001.

  6. Schartl M, Georges A, Marshall Graves JA. Polygenic sex determination in vertebrates – is there any such thing? Trends Genet. 2023;39(4):242–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tig.2022.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocher TD, Meisel RP, Gamble T, Behrens KA, Gammerdinger WJ. Yes, polygenic sex determination is a thing! Trends Genet. 2024;40(12):1001–17. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tig.2024.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang L, Sun F, Wan ZY, Yang Z, Tay YX, Lee M, et al. Transposon-induced epigenetic silencing in the X chromosome as a novel form of dmrt1 expression regulation during sex determination in the fighting fish. BMC Biology. 2022;20(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12915-021-01205-y.

  9. Weber C, Zhou Y, Lee JG, Looger LL, Qian G, Ge C, Capel B. Temperature-dependent sex determination is mediated by pSTAT3 repression of Kdm6b. Science. 2020;368:303–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/science.aaz4165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Whiteley SL, Holleley CE, Wagner S, Blackburn J, Deveson IW, Marshall Graves JA, Georges A: Two transcriptionally distinct pathways drive female development in a reptile with both genetic and temperature dependent sex determination. PLOS Genetics 2021;17(4). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009465

  11. Ambros V. The fctions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nature02871.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Azhar S, Dong D, Shen W-J, Hu Z, Kraemer FB. The role of miRNAs in regulating adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis. J Mol Endocrinol. 2020;64(1):R21–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1530/jme-19-0105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma Q, de Cuevas M, Matunis EL. Chinmo is sufficient to induce male fate in somatic cells of the adult Drosophila ovary. Development. 2016;143:754–63. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1242/dev.129627.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonneau E, Neveu B, Kostantin E, Tsongalis GJ, De Guire V. How close are miRNAs from clinical practice? A perspective on the diagnostic and therapeutic market. EJIFCC. 2019;30:114–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhat RA, Priyam M, Foysal MJ, Gupta SK, Sundaray JK. Role of sex-biased miRNAs in teleosts – a review. Rev Aquac. 2020;13(1):269–81. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/raq.12474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao N, Wang Q, Deng Q, Dong Z, Zhang B: Heterogeneity of sex-biased miRNAs profiling of Cynoglossus semilaevis between exosome and sperm. Aquaculture 2023;563. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738898

  17. Meng X, Zhang X, Li J, Liu P. Identification and comparative profiling of ovarian and testicular microRNAs in the swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus. Gene. 2018;640:6–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.gene.2017.10.026.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guan C, Tan Z, Li S, Wang Y, Yamamoto N, Zhang C, Wang S, Chen J, Xing X: Transcriptomic analysis of Andrias davidianus meat and experimental validation for exploring its bioactive components as functional foods. Food Science and Human Wellness 2024;13(1):166–172. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.26599/fshw.2022.9250014

  19. He D, Zhu W, Zeng W, Lin J, Ji Y, Wang Y, Zhang C, Lu Y, Zhao D, Su N, et al. Nutritional and medicinal characteristics of Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus) for applications in healthcare industry by artificial cultivation: A review. Food Sci Human Wellness. 2018;7(1):1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shu G, Liu P, Zhao T, Li C, Hou Y, Zhao C, Wang J, Shu X, Chang J, Jiang J, Xie F: Disordered Translocation is Hastening Local Extinction of the Chinese Giant Salamander. Asian Herpetol Res 2021;12(3): 271–279. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.200080

  21. Hu Q, Tian H, Xiao H. Effects of temperature and sex steroids on sex ratio, growth, and growth-related gene expression in the Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus. Aquat Biol. 2019;28:79–90. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3354/ab00710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu Q, Tian H, Li W, Meng Y, Wang Q, Xiao H. Identification of critical sex-biased genes in Andrias davidianus by de novo transcriptome. Mol Genet Genomics. 2018;294(2):287–99. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00438-018-1508-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao H, Huang J, Fang C, Ma H, Zhang H, Deng J, Jiang W, Kong F, Zhang H, Liu H et al: Predicting Sex-Related Transcripts in the Chinese Giant Salamander (Andrias davidianus): A Transcriptomics Study, Selection Gender for Preservation, Breeding and Reintroduction. Fishes 2022;7(6). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/fishes7060399

  24. Webster KA, Schach U, Ordaz A, Steinfeld JS, Draper BW, Siegfried KR. DMRT1 is necessary for male sexual development in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2017;422(1):33–46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang S, Tang X, Yan F, Yang H, Xu L, Jian Z, Deng H, He Q, Zhu G, Wang Q: A time-course transcriptome analysis revealing the potential molecular mechanism of early gonadal differentiation in the Chinese giant salamander. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 2024;50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cbd.2024.101200

  26. Chen R, Du J, Ma L. Wang L-q, Xie S-s, Yang C-m, Lan X-y, Pan C-y, Dong W-z: Comparative microRNAome analysis of the testis and ovary of the Chinese giant salamander. Reproduction. 2017;154(3):269–79. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1530/rep-17-0109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang Y, Chen H, Gao X, Sun X. Identification and Characteristics of Conserved miRNA in Testis Tissue from Chinese Giant Salamander (Andrias davidianus) by Deep Sequencing. Russ J Bioorg Chem. 2019;45(2):135–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1134/s106816201902016x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wen M, Shen Y, Shi S, Tang T. miREvo: an integrative microRNA evolutionary analysis platform for next-generation sequencing experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:140. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1471-2105-13-140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Friedländer MR, Mackowiak SD, Li N, Chen W, Rajewsky N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(1):37–52. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gkr688.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S: Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 2014;15(12). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

  31. Wagner S, Whiteley SL, Castelli M, Patel HR, Deveson IW, Blackburn J, Holleley CE, Marshall Graves JA, Georges A: Gene expression of male pathway genes SOX9 and amh during early sex differentiation in a reptile departs from the classical amniote model. BMC Genomics 2023;24(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12864-023-09334-0

  32. Hu Q, Chang C, Wang Q, Tian H, Qiao Z, Wang L, Meng Y, Xu C, Xiao H: Genome-wide RAD sequencing to identify a sex-specific marker in Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus. BMC Genomics 2019;20(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12864-019-5771-5

  33. Su S, Wang Y, Wang H, Huang W, Chen J, Xing J, Xu P, Yuan X, Huang C, Zhou Y: Comparative expression analysis identifies the respiratory transition-related miRNAs and their target genes in tissues of metamorphosing Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus). BMC Genomics 2018;19(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12864-018-4662-5

  34. Nagahama Y, Chakraborty T, Paul-Prasanth B, Ohta K, Nakamura M. Sex determination, gonadal sex differentiation, and plasticity in vertebrate species. Physiol Rev. 2021;101(3):1237–308. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1152/physrev.00044.2019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gilchrist G, Tscherner A, Nalpathamkalam T, Merico D, LaMarre J: MicroRNA Expression during Bovine Oocyte Maturation and Fertilization. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2016;17(3). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijms17030396

  36. Luo M, Hao L, Hu F, Dong Y, Gou L, Zhang W, Wang X, Zhao Y, Jia M, Hu S, et al. MicroRNA profiles and potential regulatory pattern during the early stage of spermatogenesis in mice. Science China Life Sciences. 2014;58(5):442–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11427-014-4737-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen G, Wu R, Liu B, Dong W, Tu Z, Yang J, Xu Z, Pan T. Upstream and downstream mechanisms for the promoting effects of IGF-1 on differentiation of spermatogonia to primary spermatocytes. Life Sci. 2014;101(1–2):49–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.lfs.2014.02.016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lan T, Chen Y-L, Gul Y, Zhao B-W, Gao Z-X. Comparative expression analysis of let-7 microRNAs during ovary development in Megalobrama amblycephala. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2019;45(3):1101–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10695-019-00624-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Du X, Liu X, Zhang K, Liu Y, Cheng J, Zhang Q. Discovery and functional characterization of microRNAs and their potential roles for gonadal development in spotted knifejaw, Oplegnathus punctatus. Comp Biochem Physiol D: Genomics Proteomics. 2018;28:1–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cbd.2018.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li W, He P, Zhang X, Guan J, Chen Y, Zhang L, Zhang B, Zheng Y, Li X, He Q et al: Identification and Characterization of microRNAs in the Gonads of Litopenaeus vannamei Using High-Throughput Sequencing. Fishes 2022;7(6). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/fishes7060308

  41. Li S, Lin G, Fang W, Gao D, Huang J, Xie J, Lu J: Identification and Comparison of microRNAs in the Gonad of the Yellowfin Seabream (Acanthopagrus Latus). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020;21(16). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijms21165690

  42. Wang P, Wang L, Yang J, Luan P, Zhang X, Kuang Y, Sun X. Sex-biased miRNAs of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) and their potential role in reproductive development. Aquaculture. 2018;485:73–80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.11.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Luo BY, Xiong XY, Liu X, He XY, Qiu GF. Identification and characterization of sex-biased and differentially expressed miRNAs in gonadal developments of the Chinese mitten crab. Eriocheir sinensis Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2021;88(3):217–27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/mrd.23459.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu Y, Wang Y, Xue Y, Wu N, Wu J, Zhang J: CBX2 is a functional target of the let-7 family in the gonad of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2023, 263. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cbpb.2022.110799

  45. Lin J-Q, Zhou Q, Yang H-Q, Fang L-M, Tang K-Y, Sun L, Wan Q-H, Fang S-G. Molecular mechanism of temperature-dependent sex determination and differentiation in Chinese alligator revealed by developmental transcriptome profiling. Science Bulletin. 2018;63(4):209–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.scib.2018.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang J, Wan H, Jiang J, Huang Y, Zou P, Zhang Z, Jia X, Wang Y: miR-34 negatively regulates the expression of Dmrt and related genes in the testis of mud crab Scylla paramamosain. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2025;275. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cbpb.2024.111018

  47. Zhou M, Jia X, Wan H, Wang S, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Wang Y. miR-34 regulates reproduction by inhibiting the expression of MIH, CHH, EcR, and FAMeT genes in mud crab Scylla paramamosain. Mol Reprod Dev. 2018;86(2):122–31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/mrd.23063.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sarangdhar MA, Chaubey D, Srikakulam N, Pillai B. Parentally inherited long non-coding RNA Cyrano is involved in zebrafish neurodevelopment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(18):9726–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gky628.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Castelli MA, Whiteley SL, Georges A, Holleley CE. Cellular calcium and redox regulation: the mediator of vertebrate environmental sex determination? Biol Rev. 2020;95(3):680–95. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/brv.12582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very thankful for Yunxing Professional Breeding Cooperative of Giant Salamander in Ya'an, Sichuan Province for their breeding work and are equally grateful to Dr. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi in Sichuan Agricultural University for his modification work in the language of this paper.

Funding

This study is supported to Wang Q by Applied Basic Project of Sichuan Science and Technology Department (2022NSFSC0122). Additional support is provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC32270477) to Zhu GX.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.J.Y. and Q.W. conceived and designed the study. G.X.Z. and Q.W. supervised the work. X.L.W., H.Y., F.Y., L.S.X., Z.J.J., and S.J.Y. collected samples and conducted experiments. S.J.Y. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. S.J.Y. and Q.W. revised the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qin Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The sampling location is not privately owned or protected, and no specific permission is required for sample collection. Animal handling and euthanasia followed Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols, approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (license number SKY-2021116003). The methods applied in this study were carried out in strict accordance with the Laboratory Animal Management Principles of China.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, S., Wang, X., Yang, H. et al. Identification of sex-biased and gonadal developmental miRNAs during critical windows of early gonadal differentiation in the Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus). BMC Genomics 26, 238 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12864-025-11419-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12864-025-11419-x

Keywords